By Foshee Construction Team
Plant Street, a commercial project in Winter Garden that recently broke ground, is a good example of why this matters. Commercial developments like it frequently generate the traffic volume that triggers offsite roadway conditions, and when they do, the turn lane scope has to be coordinated with the site's own schedule from day one rather than treated as an afterthought once the building is underway.
Instead of a generic five-phase table, it's more useful to look at what specifically changes once offsite work enters the picture, compared to work that stays on the private parcel.
| On the Private Parcel | Once Offsite Work Is Triggered |
| :-- | :-- |
| Site plan permit governs the work | A separate right-of-way or FDOT/county permit is also required |
| Traffic control is minimal, mostly for deliveries | Maintenance of traffic (MOT) plans are required for active roadway work |
| Utility conflicts are typically known from the site survey | Existing utilities in the right-of-way may not be fully mapped and need locates and potholing |
| Inspections follow the local building/site plan process | A separate roadway inspector or DOT representative signs off on the improvement |
| Schedule risk is largely within the contractor's control | Schedule risk includes agency review time and public-safety coordination outside the contractor's control |
| Closeout ties to certificate of occupancy for the building | Closeout may require the roadway improvement to be accepted before the CO is released |
- Has the traffic study already identified what offsite improvement will be required, or is that still pending agency review?
- Which agency has jurisdiction over the roadway — county, city, or FDOT — and how does that affect the permit timeline?
- Will the turn lane work require lane closures, and if so, has a maintenance of traffic plan been developed?
- Are utilities within the right-of-way fully located, or does the scope need potholing before design is finalized?
- Is the certificate of occupancy for the building contingent on the offsite improvement being accepted?
- A site schedule that doesn't account for a separate right-of-way permit review timeline.
- Traffic control plans that get developed after the work is already scheduled to start.
- Assuming existing right-of-way utility records are accurate without field verification.
- No clear answer on which inspector or agency has final sign-off authority for the roadway work.
- Treating the turn lane as a small add-on scope instead of its own mini-project with its own permit path.
For related sitework groundwork, see Foshee's guidance on utility installation - https://fosheeconstruction.com/blog/utility-installation-complete-guide and erosion prevention on construction sites - https://fosheeconstruction.com/blog/erosion-prevention-construction-sites.
Typically a traffic impact study, required as part of site plan approval, shows that the project will add enough vehicle trips to a corridor to warrant a deceleration lane, turn lane, or signal change. The threshold and required improvement come from the reviewing agency, not the developer.
It depends on which road the site fronts. Local roads typically fall under county or city jurisdiction, while state roads fall under FDOT, and each has its own permit process, review timeline, and inspection requirements.
Sometimes, depending on the agreement with the permitting authority, but in many cases the offsite improvement has to be substantially complete and accepted before the CO is released — which is why the two schedules need to be planned together, not separately.
Yes. Any work performed within an active roadway right-of-way requires a maintenance of traffic (MOT) plan reviewed by the agency with jurisdiction, separate from any traffic control used on the private parcel.
Offsite turn lane work isn't a smaller version of the site scope — it's a different scope, with its own permit, its own inspector, and its own risk to the schedule. Projects that plan for it early, rather than bolting it on once the building is underway, are the ones that hit their certificate of occupancy date.
Foshee Construction has coordinated offsite roadway improvements alongside commercial site development across Central Florida since 1994. To talk through a project with offsite requirements, start with the Foshee contact page - https://fosheeconstruction.com/contact.
- Why Foshee - https://fosheeconstruction.com/why-foshee
- Utility Installation - https://fosheeconstruction.com/blog/utility-installation-complete-guide
- Underground Pipe Installation in Florida - https://fosheeconstruction.com/blog/underground-pipe-installation-florida
- Foshee Construction Blog - https://fosheeconstruction.com/blog
We build bids using HeavyBid and AGTEK because the details matter long before the job starts. When the numbers are accurate and the scope is clearly defined, it sets the tone for how the entire project runs. Estimating isn’t just a step in the process, it’s the foundation we build on.
That same mindset carries into the field. Our crew is trained to work with purpose, follow the Civil Engineers’ Plan to the finest detail, and hold the line on quality. When expectations are clear from day one, there’s no need for shortcuts, and no confusion about how the work gets done.
Clients trust our bid packages because they’re complete and ready to use. Project managers know what we’re covering, what’s excluded, and how we plan to approach the job. That clarity removes friction and lets teams focus on execution instead of interpretation.
As part of our review process, we go into the plans before anything hits the site. We ask the questions early, resolve issues before they show up in the field, and keep RFIs moving. This approach prevents delays and protects the timeline.
Over time, that consistency builds trust. Many of the people we work with today came through referrals from past projects – engineers, GCs, and superintendents who’ve seen how we operate and want the same experience again.
In 2024, Foshee Construction was acquired by Saga Infrastructure Solutions, a national network of civil construction companies. Saga supports regional contractors by giving them access to better tools, long-term resources, and operational backing, without changing how they run day to day.
Foshee will continue to operate under its name, with the same team and field leadership in place.
“From the very time a project starts, we start that partnership. We try to catch as much as we can with the tools that we have. Not everybody is using the software platforms we are. That’s the differentiator: we’re not just bidding. We’re anticipating, problem-solving, and making sure the job runs right.”
— Don, CEO, Saga Infrastructure Solutions
Foshee is now part of a broader regional strategy that includes Florida, the Piedmont Atlantic, Texas, Colorado, and the Arizona Sun Corridor. The name, crews, and standards remain. What’s improving is the support behind it.
